Why did the board put the question back on the ballot?
After much deliberation, the Board determined that the best path forward is to put the same referendum question from November 8th back on the ballot on April 4th. The primary reasons are:
- Clarity: Post-election feedback and analysis indicates that many voters were either unaware, uninformed, misinformed, or confused about November’s referendum. Now that the electorate appears to be more engaged, there is an opportunity for a healthy conversation about facility needs and implications for our students and community.
- Unmet needs: Real and present needs have been identified through a comprehensive master facility planning process. Waiting will only compound these issues and costs.
- Timing: The April election is the last opportunity to issue new bonds that coincide with the retirement of current debt. In other words, the annual debt payment (approximately 10% of school taxes) would continue.
What projects are planned at each school?
H.C. Storm School and Louise White School will be rebuilt on site, and each of our other six schools will undergo significant improvements. The full extent of school improvements is contingent upon economics, particularly bond interest rates, inflation, and construction costs.
What are the financial implications of this referendum?
Currently, the District pays $9.1 million annually for current bond debt (approximately 10% of school property taxes). If the referendum passes, the amount of that annual debt payment and the taxes collected for it would remain level. If the referendum fails, taxes will go down. For additional information, check the “Why it Matters” section for a one-page document on the Financial Implications.
Why are H.C Storm and Louise White Schools being rebuilt rather than renovated?
It is more cost-effective to rebuild, rather than renovate, these schools. The extent of renovations required to modernize these schools also triggers compliance with modern building codes (including fire sprinklers, handicap accessibility, and tornado shelters) and exceeds replacement costs. Additionally, students would remain in their current school during construction.
Why are the schools in need of these improvements? Weren’t they better maintained?
For nearly forty years, school facility improvements were primarily focused on building additions to accommodate Batavia’s rapid population growth. In fact, Batavia High School has undergone 10 additions since it was built in 1966. In almost every instance, funding was insufficient to meet the aging infrastructure needs. Furthermore, the Great Recession necessitated program cuts, salary freezes, layoffs, and deferment of important maintenance capital projects — creating profound long-term financial implications. The District has only recently re-established its financial footing, enabling it to now allocate over $2 million annually (and increasing) for capital projects from operating funds.
How was the master plan determined?
For five years (2017-2021), teams of staff, citizens, and architects worked to develop a comprehensive master facilities plan through our Building Our Future Together initiative. In doing so, they considered enrollment projections, current and future educational programming needs, building conditions, community input, and the future of education.
After the master plan was completed, another team of citizens engaged the community further to discern how the identified projects might be funded. Focus groups and surveys were conducted to identify community priorities and concerns. This feedback culminated in the referendum proposal from the Board of Education on the November 2022 election ballot.